ANNOYING PEOPLE
By “annoying” I don’t mean someone who’s a neatnick or has
no sense of color or who laughs strangely or who eats too
many onions. Annoying people are those who don’t respect
your space or time or skill or position. They insist that
you notice them or at least stand in your way so you can’t
help but adjust to their presence.
First consider this about such a person:
· Her social ineptness, inability to form relationships,
and apparent rudeness are pathological. Something is
mis-wired in her brain. She perceives that she’s
communicating acceptably and effectively.
· His intrusiveness and inability to empathize are the
result of a zoo-style upbringing. He doesn’t comprehend
privacy. Either he’s like a sheepdog and needs to know
where everybody is all the time. (Maybe like a sheepdog
puppy.) Or he’s like a black fly. You just want to swat him
and watch him writhe forever on the floor.
· She can handle exactly so much load and never a straw
more. She lives in constant fear that everything else in
her world is going to collapse at any moment. She’s like
the juggler balancing spinning plates on raised sticks. If
one plate falls, it’s over for her. She can’t stop and pick
that one back up without the rest crashing down around her.
So whatever you ask of her, even though it doesn’t affect
her personal life, is threatening, because it might upset
one of her precariously-balanced plates. She fears that if
her job plate becomes wobbly, the end of the world is near.
· He is friendly and likeable, but his personal habits are
atrocious. He coughs on his papers, drinks from dirty cups,
eats crumbs that fell on the floor, puts his shoes on his
chair, and wears glasses that look like they need to go
through a dishwasher. You want to put him through a
dishwasher. He doesn’t smell badly, but if he did it would
complete the picture. He was probably raised normally but
now has a different view of hygiene, possibly due to
political influences that encourage rejecting conventional
habits.
Each of these types has few friends. Anyone who even
tolerates their annoying traits becomes their best buddy.
If the person bugging you is one of these, you have an
explanation, and it isn’t about you. The anger the first
one shows, the constant presence of the second, the
furtiveness of the third, and the oblivion of the fourth
have little to do with you or what you’ve done. Get close
enough to the center of each one’s being and you’re going
to end up dealing with the eccentricity there. In a way,
it’s a benign pathology in each of them. Benign and in most
ways forgivable. They don’t know how they come across and
can’t help it.
If the annoying person is not one of the above, then
something more sinister is at play.
· Is she imperial? Does she behave as if she invented the
world or was placed in charge until God comes back from
vacation?
· Is he lascivious? Does he always seem to be talking to
pretty women and never to the big or old or homely ones?
· Is she devious and evasive but in a friendly sort of way
that you can see right through?
· Does he always seem to be watching for your mistakes and
have an answer for everything before you even know the
question?
These are the manipulators and the parasites. They are not
benign. But you don’t have to yield to their control.
Generally, they want easy prey. If your position alone
doesn’t give you the authority, then command their respect
by asserting yourself. Give them a hint once in a while
that you see what they’re up to. Remain cordial and
fearless.
Beyond these types, there are people more dangerous than
annoying.
· He’s the one who expects you to listen to dirty jokes
(not once in a while, but continually) and enjoys even your
negative reaction. He acts like he wants to help all the
time and makes sure things happen that then make him
indispensable. Others know what he’s all about too, but
he’s probably uniquely indispensable to the organization so
nothing can be done about his offensiveness. He keeps it
just subtle enough that it escapes definition.
· She’s the one who is constantly indignant about something
and assuring you that you’ve screwed up again. She always
has plenty of examples to share about how others are
screwing up too, so you know she’s complaining about you
everywhere else.
These people are few, and they may normally leave you
alone. But when they attack they need to be repelled. They
need to be shown or told that they are not welcome and not
succeeding. If their business with you is legitimate,
remain cordial and professional. If their business with you
is to use you as a victim, use your resources. You have
“superiors,” you have specific wording recommended by law,
you have witnesses, and you have your wits. Trust your wits
last.
There is plenty of crossover between these two groups of
annoying people. She can be fragile and imperial at the
same time. He can be intrusive and lascivious at the same
time. Combine these traits in any way you want to and see
who emerges.
Worse than any of these are the people who have actually
set out to harm you.
The people who have betrayed me, lied about me, tried to
undermine me, and so forth – they aren’t many but they are
out there – I have regarded more with pity than with scorn.
I have done my best to treat them as I want to be treated,
although my best has not always made me proud.
Is it possible to push my buttons, to hurt me, to make me
want to retaliate? Sure. I have vulnerabilities. It’s not
what others would do to me but what I would do to them that
would damage my self-respect.
People who attack me to my face are pathological. Those who
would attack me behind my back are petty, and anyone I
respect won’t be fooled by them. Rarely, maybe too rarely,
have I gone out and tried to replace the misinformation
with the truth. (Some call that standing up for yourself.)
I may rely too heavily on the concept that what I do will
speak more loudly than what others say about me. I think
most people understand the concept: Consider the source.
Most liars and gossips are recognized for what they are.
I’d rather err on the side of proving the lie in what they
say rather than following the liar around and trying to
undo the damage. To the extent I go around standing up for
myself, the liar is in control and I’m wasting precious
time and energy.
Have I ever been mad enough to retaliate? In my adult life,
not that I recall. Most of my adult life I’ve been pretty
confident. Most of my adult life I’ve also been asked to
assume some type of leadership role. I would not and have
not abused power. (I often haven’t even recognized when
I’ve had it or how much.) I can think of a couple of
instances when the kindness I’ve shown to someone trying to
harm me has actually startled or alarmed them – has, as
Yeshua said it would, heaped burning coals upon their
heads. I can also think of times when I’ve used my
authority in unexpected ways and disarmed the one bent on
destruction.
About one annoying person in particular: She supervises a
department or two. She is the first type listed above –
socially inept, rude, commanding. Compare her to a
basketball coach. She thinks she’s running a team. She can
yell at them from the sidelines, charge onto the floor and
argue with the referees or other “coaches” (as she sees
other department heads), and demand to see the rule book.
She yells at the other teams’ coaches. She especially
belittles the other teams’ assistant coaches. She once knew
a coach who yelled at the team members and abused them
verbally and the team loved the coach for it. It was a
legendary relationship. They became the most loyal, winning
team. When that coach was eventually called to task for
dishing out the abuse, the team rallied in support of the
coach and won a reprieve. So here she is now in our midst
with the self-image of the crude but beloved coach, but
that will never be her.
Do you treat her like a coach? You can if you know your
place. Will she consider you an assistant coach or will she
consider you the commissioner of basketball? She’ll treat
you differently depending how you appear to her. The trick,
frankly, is not to play by her rules at all. Know her game,
and then don’t play it. This will frustrate her for a
while, but eventually she will view you in a different
costume. Look back at the description again. She can’t
discern for herself who you really are. She doesn’t grasp
nuance. She needs to classify you in a defined role and
treat you according to the social rules for the role you’re
in. I’m not saying assume that role. I’m saying you should
be yourself but by knowing her game you can thwart her
rules, confuse her, and let her sort you out as best she
can. She understands hierarchy and respect. She doesn’t
respect someone with fewer coaching credentials than she
has unless she is compelled to respect you by association,
by her inability to classify you, or, believe it or not, by
the kindness you show.
By all this am I suggesting that I am or that you be a
manipulator? Not exactly. When you pull a knife-wielder off
balance as he attacks you, yes, for a moment you’re
manipulating him. I’m suggesting that you anticipate and
adjust enough to the manipulators that you thwart their
efforts. You’re not the one on the attack. They’re on the
attack, either quickly, like locusts, or slowly, like
termites. Both devour everything consumable in their paths.
Don’t be consumable.
2002
©DamnYankee.com